VN April 2023

Vetnews | April 2023 27 S, Kenis M, et al. 2008. Grasping at the routes of biological invasions: a framework for integrating pathways into policy. J Appl Ecol 45: 403–14. Jepson P and Ladle RJ. 2005. Bird-keeping in Indonesia: conservation impacts and the potential for substitution-based conservation responses. Oryx 39: 442–48. Katsanevakis S, Zenetos A, Belchior C, et al. 2013. Invading European seas: assessing pathways of introduction of marine non-natives. Ocean Coast Manage 76: 64–74. Keller RP and Lodge DM. 2007. Species invasions from commerce in live aquatic organisms: problems and possible solutions. BioScience 57: 428–36. Kikillus KH, Hare KM, and Hartley S. 2012. Online trading tools as a method of estimating propagule pressure via the pet-release pathway. Biol Invasions 14: 2657–64. Knobel DL, Laurenson MK, Kazwala RR, et al. 2008. A cross-sectional study of factors associated with dog ownership in Tanzania. BMC Vet Res 4: 5. Kraus F. 2009. Alien reptiles and amphibians: a scientific compendium and analysis. Basel, Switzerland: Springer Nature. Krysko KL, Burgess JP, Rochford MR, et al. 2011. Verified non-indigenous amphibians and reptiles in Florida from 1863 through 2010: outlining the invasion process and identifying invasion pathways and stages. Zootaxa 3028: 1–64. Livengood EJ, Funicelli N, and Chapman NA. 2014. The applicability of the US Law Enforcement Management System (LEMIS) database for the protection and management of ornamental fish. AACL Bioflux 7: 268–75. Lyons JA and Natusch DJ. 2013. Effects of consumer preferences for rarity on the harvest of wild populations within a species. Ecol Econ 93: 278–83. McNeely JA, Kapoor-Vijay P, Lu Z, et al. 2009. Conservation biology in Asia: the major policy challenges. Conserv Biol 23: 805–10. Padilla DK and Williams SL. 2004. Beyond ballast water: aquarium and ornamental trades as a source of invasive species in aquatic ecosystems. Front Ecol Environ 2: 131–38. Ramsay NF, Ng PKA, O’Riordan RM, et al. 2007. The red-eared slider (Trachemys scripta elegans) in Asia: a review. In: Gherardi F (Ed). Biological invaders in inland waters: profiles, distribution, and threats. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer. Reaser JK andMeyers NM. 2007. HabitattitudeTM: getting a backbone about the pet release pathway. In: Witmer GW, Pitt WC, and Fagerstone KA (Eds). Managing vertebrate invasive species: proceedings of an international symposium. Fort Collins, CO: US Department of Agriculture. Rhyne AL, Tlusty MF, Szczebak JT, and Holmberg RJ. 2017. Expanding our understanding of the trade in marine aquarium animals. PeerJ 5: e2949. Rhyne AL, Tlusty MF, Schofield PJ, et al. 2012. Revealing the appetite of the marine aquarium fish trade: the volume and biodiversity of fish imported into the United States. PLoS ONE 7: e35808. Rixon CAM, Duggan IC, Bergeron NMN, et al. 2005. Invasion risks posed by the aquarium trade and live fish markets on the Laurentian Great Lakes. Biodivers Conserv 14: 1365–81. Robinson JE, Griffiths RA, St John FAV, et al. 2015. Dynamics of the global trade in live reptiles: shifting trends in production and consequences for sustainability. Biol Conserv 184: 42–50. Romagosa C. 2014. Patterns of live vertebrate importation into the United States: analysis of an invasion pathway. In: Keller RP, Cadotte MW, and Glenn S (Eds). Invasive species in a globalized world: ecological, social, and legal perspectives on policy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Rosa CA, Curi NHA, Puertas F, et al. 2017. Alien terrestrial mammals in Brazil: current status and management. Biol Invasions 19: 2101–23. Shepherd CR, Compton J, and Warne S. 2007. In: Carew-Reid J, Salazar R, and Spring S (Eds). Transport infrastructure and wildlife trade conduits in the GMS: regulating illegal and unsustainable wildlife trade. Philippines: Asian Development Bank. Smith KF, Behrens MD, Max LM, et al. 2008. US drowning in unidentified fishes: scope, implications, and regulation of live fish import. Conserv Lett 1: 103–09. Springborn M, Romagosa CM, and Keller RP. 2011. The value of nonindigenous species risk assessment in international trade. Ecol Econ 70: 2145–53. Springborn M, Keller RP, Elwood S, et al. 2015. Integrating invasion and disease in the risk assessment of live bird trade. Divers Distrib 21: 101–10. Strecker AL, Campbell PM, and Olden JD. 2011. The aquarium trade as an invasion pathway in the Pacific Northwest. Fisheries 36: 74–85. Stringham OC and Lockwood JL. 2018. Pet problems: biological and economic factors that influence the release of alien reptiles and amphibians by pet owners. J Appl Ecol 55: 2632–40. Su S, Cassey P, and Blackburn TM. 2014. Patterns of non-randomness in the composition and characteristics of the Taiwanese bird trade. Biol Invasions 16: 2563–75. Su S, Cassey P, Vall-llosera M, et al. 2015. Going cheap: determinants of bird price in the Taiwanese pet market. PLoS ONE 10: e0127482. Tella JL and Hiraldo F. 2014. Illegal and legal parrot trade shows a long-term, cross-cultural preference for the most attractive species increasing their risk of extinction. PLoS ONE 9: e107546. Vall-llosera M and Cassey P. 2017a. Leaky doors: private captivity as a prominent source of bird introductions in Australia. PLoS ONE 12: e0172851. Vall-llosera M and Cassey P. 2017b. Physical attractiveness, constraints to the trade and handling requirements drive the variation in species availability in the Australian cagebird trade. Ecol Econ 131: 407–13. van Ham C, Genovesi P, and Scalera R. 2013. Invasive alien species: the urban dimension – case studies on strengthening local action in Europe. Brussels, Belgium: International Union for Conservation of Nature, European Union Representative Office. van Wilgen NJ, Wilson JRU, Elith J, et al. 2010. Alien invaders and reptile traders: what drives the live animal trade in South Africa? Anim Conserv 13: 24–32. Weigle SM, Smith D, Carlton JT, et al. 2005. Assessing the risk of introducing exotic species via the live marine species trade. Conserv Biol 19: 213–23. Supporting Information Additional, web-only material may be found in the online version of this article at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/fee.2059/suppinfo Rhyne AL, Tlusty MF, Szczebak JT, and Holmberg RJ. 2017. Expanding our understanding of the trade in marine aquarium animals. PeerJ 5: e2949. Rhyne AL, Tlusty MF, Schofield PJ, et al. 2012. Revealing the appetite of the marine aquarium fish trade: the volume and biodiversity of fish imported into the United States. PLoS ONE 7: e35808. Rixon CAM, Duggan IC, Bergeron NMN, et al. 2005. Invasion risks posed by the aquarium trade and live fish markets on the Laurentian Great Lakes. Biodivers Conserv 14: 1365–81. Robinson JE, Griffiths RA, St John FAV, et al. 2015. Dynamics of the global trade in live reptiles: shifting trends in production and consequences for sustainability. Biol Conserv 184: 42–50. Romagosa C. 2014. Patterns of live vertebrate importation into theUnited States: analysis of an invasion pathway. In: Keller RP, Cadotte MW, and Glenn S (Eds). Invasive species in a globalized world: ecological, social, and legal perspectives on policy. Chicago,IL: University of Chicago Press. 1 Ecology, Evolution, and Natural Resources, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ * (julie.lockwood@rutgers.edu ); 2 Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL; 3 Centre for Applied Conservation Science, and School of Biological Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia; 4 Biological Sciences, University of Toronto, Scarborough,Canada; 5 EnvironmentalScienceandManagement,Portland State University, Portland, OR; 6 Biology, McGill University, Montreal, Canada; 7 School for the Environment, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, MA; 8 School of Forest Resources and Conservation, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL; 9 Environmental Science and Policy, University of California Davis, Davis, CA; 10 Mammal Research Institute, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa; 11 Department of Biology, Marine Biology, and Environmental Science, Roger Williams University, Bristol, RI; 12 Institute of Environmental Sustainability, Loyola University Chicago, Chicago, IL This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. 15409309, 2019, 6, Downloaded from https://esajournals.onlinelibrary. wiley.com/doi/10.1002/fee.2059 by South African Medical Research, Wiley Online Library on [18/03/2023]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License Article